Deprecated: Return type of DrupalCacheArray::offsetExists($offset) should either be compatible with ArrayAccess::offsetExists(mixed $offset): bool, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice in /home/rprlib/prod72/www/includes/bootstrap.inc on line 362

Deprecated: Return type of DrupalCacheArray::offsetGet($offset) should either be compatible with ArrayAccess::offsetGet(mixed $offset): mixed, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice in /home/rprlib/prod72/www/includes/bootstrap.inc on line 369

Deprecated: Return type of DrupalCacheArray::offsetSet($offset, $value) should either be compatible with ArrayAccess::offsetSet(mixed $offset, mixed $value): void, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice in /home/rprlib/prod72/www/includes/bootstrap.inc on line 381

Deprecated: Return type of DrupalCacheArray::offsetUnset($offset) should either be compatible with ArrayAccess::offsetUnset(mixed $offset): void, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice in /home/rprlib/prod72/www/includes/bootstrap.inc on line 388
University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center

early detection of cancer

×

Error message

  • Warning: ini_set(): Session ini settings cannot be changed after headers have already been sent in drupal_environment_initialize() (line 695 of /home/rprlib/prod72/www/includes/bootstrap.inc).
  • Warning: ini_set(): Session ini settings cannot be changed after headers have already been sent in drupal_environment_initialize() (line 696 of /home/rprlib/prod72/www/includes/bootstrap.inc).
  • Warning: ini_set(): Session ini settings cannot be changed after headers have already been sent in drupal_environment_initialize() (line 697 of /home/rprlib/prod72/www/includes/bootstrap.inc).
  • Warning: ini_set(): Session ini settings cannot be changed after headers have already been sent in drupal_environment_initialize() (line 700 of /home/rprlib/prod72/www/includes/bootstrap.inc).
  • Warning: ini_set(): Session ini settings cannot be changed after headers have already been sent in drupal_environment_initialize() (line 702 of /home/rprlib/prod72/www/includes/bootstrap.inc).
  • Warning: ini_set(): Session ini settings cannot be changed after headers have already been sent in include_once() (line 328 of /home/rprlib/prod72/www/sites/default/settings.php).
  • Warning: ini_set(): Session ini settings cannot be changed after headers have already been sent in include_once() (line 329 of /home/rprlib/prod72/www/sites/default/settings.php).
  • Warning: ini_set(): Session ini settings cannot be changed after headers have already been sent in include_once() (line 337 of /home/rprlib/prod72/www/sites/default/settings.php).
  • Warning: ini_set(): Session ini settings cannot be changed after headers have already been sent in include_once() (line 344 of /home/rprlib/prod72/www/sites/default/settings.php).
  • Warning: ini_set(): Session ini settings cannot be changed after headers have already been sent in drupal_settings_initialize() (line 819 of /home/rprlib/prod72/www/includes/bootstrap.inc).
  • Warning: ini_set(): Session ini settings cannot be changed after headers have already been sent in drupal_settings_initialize() (line 828 of /home/rprlib/prod72/www/includes/bootstrap.inc).
  • Warning: session_name(): Session name cannot be changed after headers have already been sent in drupal_settings_initialize() (line 831 of /home/rprlib/prod72/www/includes/bootstrap.inc).
  • Deprecated function: Return type of DatabaseStatementBase::execute($args = [], $options = []) should either be compatible with PDOStatement::execute(?array $params = null): bool, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice in require_once() (line 2244 of /home/rprlib/prod72/www/includes/database/database.inc).
  • Deprecated function: Return type of DatabaseStatementEmpty::current() should either be compatible with Iterator::current(): mixed, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice in require_once() (line 2346 of /home/rprlib/prod72/www/includes/database/database.inc).
  • Deprecated function: Return type of DatabaseStatementEmpty::next() should either be compatible with Iterator::next(): void, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice in require_once() (line 2346 of /home/rprlib/prod72/www/includes/database/database.inc).
  • Deprecated function: Return type of DatabaseStatementEmpty::key() should either be compatible with Iterator::key(): mixed, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice in require_once() (line 2346 of /home/rprlib/prod72/www/includes/database/database.inc).
  • Deprecated function: Return type of DatabaseStatementEmpty::valid() should either be compatible with Iterator::valid(): bool, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice in require_once() (line 2346 of /home/rprlib/prod72/www/includes/database/database.inc).
  • Deprecated function: Return type of DatabaseStatementEmpty::rewind() should either be compatible with Iterator::rewind(): void, or the #[\ReturnTypeWillChange] attribute should be used to temporarily suppress the notice in require_once() (line 2346 of /home/rprlib/prod72/www/includes/database/database.inc).

Discussions of Dense Breasts, Breast Cancer Risk, and Screening Choices in 2019

Author/s: 
Kerlikowske, Karla", C.M., Miglioretti, D.L.

Breast density, a radiologic term that describes the proportion of parenchymal relative to fatty tissue in mammograms, is a strong and prevalent risk factor. With increasing breast density, the risk of having a breast cancer masked or hidden on mammography increases, as does future breast cancer risk.1 Almost 50% of US women aged 40 to 74 years have dense breasts (an estimated 27.6 million women). The widespread incorporation of breast density information into screening mammography reports in 36 US states and suggestion to consider supplemental imaging has resulted in women raising questions about breast density and supplemental imaging with their clinicians.2 Thus, clinicians need to be knowledgeable of the clinical significance of breast density and how it may be useful when combined with breast cancer risk to inform screening discussions.

Treatment of Nonmetastatic Breast Cancer

Author/s: 
Ruddy, Kathryn J., Ganz, Patricia A.

The treatment of breast cancer has evolved largely based on refinements in understanding of the biology of the disease and the variable risk for mortality among separate disease subtypes.1 Further, due to widespread use of screening mammography, there is a reduction in average breast tumor size at diagnosis. Breast cancer primarily affects women but also affects a smaller number of men. Because many clinicians provide medical care to patients with breast cancer, familiarity with contemporary treatments is important. In this JAMA Insights article, current practices and emerging trends in breast oncology are highlighted, including aspects of precision oncology and the recent deescalation of certain treatments to minimize long-term toxicities.

Screening for Breast Cancer in Average-Risk Women: A Guidance Statement From the American College of Physicians

Author/s: 
Qaseem, Amir, Lin, Jennifer S., Mustafa, Reem A., Horwitch, Carrie A., Wilt, Timothy J., Clinical Guidelines Committee of the American College of Physicians

Description:

The purpose of this guidance statement is to provide advice to clinicians on breast cancer screening in average-risk women based on a review of existing guidelines and the evidence they include.

Methods:

This guidance statement is derived from an appraisal of selected guidelines from around the world that address breast cancer screening, as well as their included evidence. All national guidelines published in English between 1 January 2013 and 15 November 2017 in the National Guideline Clearinghouse or Guidelines International Network library were included. In addition, the authors selected other guidelines commonly used in clinical practice. Web sites associated with all selected guidelines were checked for updates on 10 December 2018. The AGREE II (Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II) instrument was used to evaluate the quality of guidelines.

Target Audience and Patient Population:

The target audience is all clinicians, and the target patient population is all asymptomatic women with average risk for breast cancer.

Guidance Statement 1:

In average-risk women aged 40 to 49 years, clinicians should discuss whether to screen for breast cancer with mammography before age 50 years. Discussion should include the potential benefits and harms and a woman's preferences. The potential harms outweigh the benefits in most women aged 40 to 49 years.

Guidance Statement 2:

In average-risk women aged 50 to 74 years, clinicians should offer screening for breast cancer with biennial mammography.

Guidance Statement 3:

In average-risk women aged 75 years or older or in women with a life expectancy of 10 years or less, clinicians should discontinue screening for breast cancer.

Guidance Statement 4:

In average-risk women of all ages, clinicians should not use clinical breast examination to screen for breast cancer.

Screening for Cervical Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.

Author/s: 
US Preventive Services Task Force

IMPORTANCE:

The number of deaths from cervical cancer in the United States has decreased substantially since the implementation of widespread cervical cancer screening and has declined from 2.8 to 2.3 deaths per 100 000 women from 2000 to 2015.

OBJECTIVE:

To update the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) 2012 recommendation on screening for cervical cancer.

EVIDENCE REVIEW:

The USPSTF reviewed the evidence on screening for cervical cancer, with a focus on clinical trials and cohort studies that evaluated screening with high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) testing alone or hrHPV and cytology together (cotesting) compared with cervical cytology alone. The USPSTF also commissioned a decision analysis model to evaluate the age at which to begin and end screening, the optimal interval for screening, the effectiveness of different screening strategies, and related benefits and harms of different screening strategies.

FINDINGS:

Screening with cervical cytology alone, primary hrHPV testing alone, or cotesting can detect high-grade precancerous cervical lesions and cervical cancer. Screening women aged 21 to 65 years substantially reduces cervical cancer incidence and mortality. The harms of screening for cervical cancer in women aged 30 to 65 years are moderate. The USPSTF concludes with high certainty that the benefits of screening every 3 years with cytology alone in women aged 21 to 29 years substantially outweigh the harms. The USPSTF concludes with high certainty that the benefits of screening every 3 years with cytology alone, every 5 years with hrHPV testing alone, or every 5 years with both tests (cotesting) in women aged 30 to 65 years outweigh the harms. Screening women older than 65 years who have had adequate prior screening and women younger than 21 years does not provide significant benefit. Screening women who have had a hysterectomy with removal of the cervix for indications other than a high-grade precancerous lesion or cervical cancer provides no benefit. The USPSTF concludes with moderate to high certainty that screening women older than 65 years who have had adequate prior screening and are not otherwise at high risk for cervical cancer, screening women younger than 21 years, and screening women who have had a hysterectomy with removal of the cervix for indications other than a high-grade precancerous lesion or cervical cancer does not result in a positive net benefit.

CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION:

The USPSTF recommends screening for cervical cancer every 3 years with cervical cytology alone in women aged 21 to 29 years. (A recommendation) The USPSTF recommends screening every 3 years with cervical cytology alone, every 5 years with hrHPV testing alone, or every 5 years with hrHPV testing in combination with cytology (cotesting) in women aged 30 to 65 years. (A recommendation) The USPSTF recommends against screening for cervical cancer in women younger than 21 years. (D recommendation) The USPSTF recommends against screening for cervical cancer in women older than 65 years who have had adequate prior screening and are not otherwise at high risk for cervical cancer. (D recommendation) The USPSTF recommends against screening for cervical cancer in women who have had a hysterectomy with removal of the cervix and do not have a history of a high-grade precancerous lesion or cervical cancer. (D recommendation).

Subscribe to early detection of cancer